Ryan, partner since 2019 (Toronto, Ontario)
This week in charts
U.S. government yields
Trade with China
EU unafraid of trade war with China
Europe put itself at risk of a trade war when European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced the anti-subsidy investigation on Wednesday, accusing China of keeping car prices “artificially low by huge state subsidies”.
The investigation could see the European Union try to protect European carmakers by imposing punitive tariffs on cars it believes are unfairly sold at a lower price.
Trade with China makes up around 2.5 percent of eurozone GDP, but economy commissioner Paolo Gentiloni appeared to be unfazed by the warning when asked about whether the bloc’s economy could survive any tariffs.
Germany, one of the world’s biggest carmakers, is more reticent since its large, well-known brands are more exposed to the Chinese market than French manufacturers.
Although Berlin had concerns before the announcement, German Finance Minister Christian Lindner backed the probe in comments on Friday.
Experts believe Chinese cars undercut European competitors by around 20%, and Brussels believes this may be due to illegal practices but Beijing argues its industry is reaping the benefits of investment.
In the race to produce more clean tech, the EU is seeking to avoid its past mistakes.
When Russia invaded Ukraine last year, the bloc scrambled to find alternative energy sources and has poured billions of euros into bringing production closer to home.
This year von der Leyen has spearheaded multiple plans, including regulation, to advance the green transition and secure Europe’s critical raw materials supply.
The EU this year also agreed to a deal for more chip production in Europe to produce the necessary components for electrical goods.
Lego ditches oil-free brick in sustainability setback
Lego has abandoned its highest-profile effort to ditch oil-based plastics from its bricks after finding that its new material led to higher carbon emissions, in a sign of the complex trade-offs companies face in their search for sustainability.
The world’s largest toymaker announced two years ago that it had tested a prototype brick made of recycled plastic bottles rather than oil-based ABS, currently used in about 80 per cent of the billions of pieces it makes each year.
However, Niels Christiansen, chief executive of the family-owned Danish group, told the Financial Times that using recycled polyethylene terephthalate (RPET) would have led to higher carbon emissions over the product’s lifetime as it would have required new equipment.
Lego has instead decided to try to improve the carbon footprint over time of ABS, which currently needs about 2kg of petroleum to make 1kg of plastic.
The Danish toymaker initially had a target of eliminating all petroleum-based plastics in the 20 or so materials it uses in its play sets by 2030. It made a quick start in 2018 by swapping out oil-based polyethylene for a plant-based version of the same plastic that it uses in about 20 different pieces including trees and bushes.
It is also on track to eliminate single-use plastic bags used in packaging its bricks by 2025 with many current sets featuring paper containers instead.
But replacing ABS, a plastic that makes the bricks durable as well as easy to put together and pull apart — what the toymaker calls “clutch power” — has proved far harder.
Lego is now aiming to make each constituent part of ABS — acrylonitrile butadiene styrene — more sustainable by gradually incorporating more bio-based and recycled material.’
The group intends to triple its spending on sustainability to $3bn a year by 2025, and Christiansen conceded that could hurt its profit margins as it would not pass on the higher cost of buying sustainable materials to consumers.
Brooks said that Lego had shifted from having a singular focus on sustainable materials to aiming for lower emissions and potentially circular materials that can be recycled and re-used. “RPET is a great example of why we’re not trying to be so dogmatic,” he added.
Law firm develops new tactic to help companies defend against an activist investor ‘ambush’
On Wednesday, law firm Norton Rose Fulbright Canada will unveil a new corporate bylaw it has designed to thwart what it describes as “sneak attacks” from dissident shareholders who are trying to vote one or more directors off a company’s board. Otherwise known as “Vote No” or “Against” campaigns, such efforts differ from more common proxy battles in that they do not require activist investors to provide advance notice of their attack.
The law firm is proposing an amendment that companies can choose to adopt as part of the corporate bylaws that govern how members of their boards of directors can be added or removed. According to a Norton Rose webinar presentation reviewed by The Globe and Mail, the proposed bylaw would automatically postpone any shareholder meeting for 45 days where it appears that one or more unopposed director candidates will not receive enough votes to be elected. However, the board can also choose to waive the postponement.
The goal of the sneak attacks is to prevent directors targeted by activists from rallying shareholder support, thereby making it easier for them to be removed. Some question whether the tactic is widespread enough to require companies to adopt a new bylaw, but Walied Soliman, chair of Norton Rose Fulbright Canada, says updates to the Canada Business Corporations Act that took effect last year created a loophole that needs to be closed. Norton Rose Fulbright Canada has a history of proposing new corporate rules to offer better protection against activist threats.
The purpose, Mr. Soliman said, is to “ensure that disclosure is adequately provided to companies.” Otherwise, he said, it would be possible for dissident shareholders to take advantage of low voter turnout at an annual general meeting to boost their own voting power. For example, a dissident shareholder with a 25-per-cent stake in a company where only 40 per cent of total shareholders cast ballots to elect directors could wield majority control.
Stealth proxy fights used to happen “all the time,” Ms. Carson, CEO of Carson Proxy, a Toronto-based firm that often works with activist investors, said in an interview.
“If you are paying for lawyers and paying for a proxy solicitor, you’re not going to do a stealth campaign because you’re going to want to be assured of a win,” Ms. Carson said. “Doing it stealthily on the hopes that, fingers crossed, you get enough votes to get rid of the directors, that is just bad strategy.”
“I actually work with activists,” she said, “and I am not getting calls from activists saying, ‘Hey, we want to do more Against campaigns.’ ”
This week’s fun finds
EdgePointer of the month
After meeting Olivia it shouldn’t be surprising to learn that her original dream career was becoming a journalist. Luckily for us, she chose to study business after a stint as the City Desk intern at The Toronto Sun. Olivia still has the curiosity that first pushed her towards media and nurtures it by researching hobbies old and new. Whether it’s looking at chess strategies, finding new ways to live a long and healthy life or just looking into the latest gadget/outfit/accessory, she’s happy to dig deep into finding the best option available. Although it might seem like a broad range of interests to keep track of, Olivia’s other superpower is her incredible organizational skills that keep the rest of us in awe.
Before joining EdgePoint, Olivia worked as a regional sales manager at Invesco Trimark and an account manager at TD Canada Trust. She earned both her B.Comm and MBA from the University of Toronto. Among her many designations, Olivia is a Chartered Investment Manager (CIM) and an Associate Diploma (ARCT) from the Royal Conservatory of Music.
For her list, Olivia decided to share her top-5 things she can’t live without:
- Leuchtturn1917 weekly planner and notebook (A5) I need to plan and organize my life, and I’m a bit old fashioned and prefer using pen and paper. One side allows you to jot the appointments, and the other side allows you to include detailed notes.
- Kindle This is where I am not old fashioned and prefer an eReader over a book. Having moved too many times, I like to be able to carry large quantities of books in a tiny device, and to be able to read late into the night under a pile of blankets.
- Oura ring I wear it more than my wedding ring. This tracks my sleep patterns, my temperature and all my vitals to ensure my body is getting the rest and activity I need.
- Ninja Foodi Power Nutri Duo Smoothie Bowl Maker I’ve been drinking some form of a green smoothie for the past 15 years and I rarely go a day without it. Right now, I am loving this Ninja blender.
- Aesop Geranium Leaf hand wash If I’m going to kill germs, I might as well splurge and have one that smells nice!
Gen Z falls for online scams more than their boomer grandparents do
Compared to older generations, younger generations have reported higher rates of victimization in phishing, identity theft, romance scams, and cyberbullying. The Deloitte survey shows that Gen Z Americans were three times more likely to get caught up in an online scam than boomers were (16 percent and 5 percent, respectively). Compared to boomers, Gen Z was also twice as likely to have a social media account hacked (17 percent and 8 percent). Fourteen percent of Gen Z-ers surveyed said they’d had their location information misused, more than any other generation. The cost of falling for those scams may also be surging for younger people: Social Catfish’s 2023 report on online scams found that online scam victims under 20 years old lost an estimated $8.2 million in 2017. In 2022, they lost $210 million.
There are a few theories that seem to come up again and again. First, Gen Z simply uses technology more than any other generation and is therefore more likely to be scammed via that technology. Second, growing up with the internet gives younger people a familiarity with their devices that can, in some instances, incentivize them to choose convenience over safety. And third, cybersecurity education for school-aged children isn’t doing a great job of talking about online safety in a way that actually clicks with younger people’s lived experiences online.
The kinds of scams that target Gen Z aren’t too dissimilar to the ones that target everyone else online. But because Gen Z relies on technology more often, on more devices, and in more aspects of their lives, there might just be more opportunities for them to encounter a bogus email or unreliable shop, says Tanneasha Gordon, a principal at Deloitte who leads the company’s data & digital trust business. Younger people are more comfortable with meeting people online, so they might be targeted with a romance scam, for instance.
There’s another factor here, too: Many experts say that the responsibility for remaining safe while using these apps should not fall solely on the individual user. Many of the apps and systems that are designed to be convenient and fast to use could be doing a lot more to meaningfully protect their users. Gordon floated the idea of major social media platforms sending out test phishing emails — the kind that you might get from your employer, as a tool to check your own vulnerabilities — which lead users who fall for the trap toward some educational resources. Privacy settings should also be easier to access and understand.