A few charts worth discussing
“Technology can drive job creation.”
“The next U.S. President will face Social Security exhaustion, which is when the social security trust fund becomes fully depleted. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) now expects this to occur in 2032. With a declining number of workers to support outlays and with U.S. Federal debt increasing above 120% of GDP, it's difficult to imagine an outcome other than forced entitlement reform.”
Other charts worth pointing out
Canadian housing market
Housing starts – Canada vs. the U.S.
Canadian mortgage rates and payments
U.S. equity valuations
Capex cycles
S&P 500 Index – constituent cash spending
S&P 500 Index – materials % of market cap
Commodities vs. developed market equities – 10-year returns
A review of stock-based compensation
Michael Burry of 'The Big Short' fame is known for predicting the 2007-2008 housing crisis and financial crash. Now, the former hedge fund manager — who's earned a reputation for spotting potential bubbles — argues in a recent Substack that Wall Street has been overstating tech earnings by 42% over the past decade.
This comes at a time when the AI boom has led to historic highs for tech stocks, which is simultaneously stoking fears of a bursting AI bubble.
Burry's comments aren't off the cuff. He came to this conclusion after analyzing more than 1,000 annual reports from Nasdaq 100 companies going back 10 years.
The math behind the claim
Burry claims that tech companies have improperly accounted for stock-based compensation (SBC) over the past decade. As a result, investors have been paying inflated prices.
Those prices are based on a loose interpretation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), which are a standard set of rules used in financial reporting to ensure transparency and consistency.
But Burry argues that tech companies are treating SBC as "free" compensation for employees — and not accounting for real costs.
As a result, the Nasdaq 100 earnings of primary tech companies are overstated by nearly 20%, he writes, because SBC costs aren't fully factored in.
He highlights companies like Meta, which he says overstated owner earnings by about 20%. Other companies he points to include Datadog, Workday, Axon, Shopify, Palantir, Marvell, CrowdStrike and Zscaler.
Burry writes that Tesla's use of SBC was so significant, the GAAP overstatement was reduced from about 20% to 12.5% simply by removing Tesla from his analysis.
During the past decade (ending in fiscal 2025), 97 tech companies in the Nasdaq 100 reported $4.9 trillion in cumulative CAAP net income, according to Burry. But Wall Street analysts include SBC in their analysis, bumping that number up to $5.8 trillion. That, says Burry, leaves an "earnings illusion" of $1.7 trillion.
Burry has previously warned that AI hyperscalers are artificially boosting their earnings by understating the depreciation of their assets.
Broader implications for investors
The practice of improperly accounting for SBC "skews valuation metrics, making companies appear more valuable than they truly are," according to American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, per FTI Consulting. "Analysts and investors often accept these adjusted figures without question, leading to inflated market perceptions (4)"
Unless investors push back, then "widespread reliance on adjusted EBITDA as a performance measure will continue distorting financial evaluations and misleading stakeholders."
Many Americans own stocks through 401(k) plans or index funds, which are increasingly concentrated in major tech companies. So they could face significant losses if valuations were to normalize.
Out of 2,013 U.S. stock funds (excluding sector funds) screened in Morningstar Direct, an investment analysis platform, Morningstar found that 119 of those "had 50% or more of their assets in tech, while 298 had a 40% or higher allocation."
And those numbers are understated, since some investors categorize tech stocks under different sectors — such as categorizing Meta and Alphabet under the communications services sector.
That means 401(k)s and index funds that are heavily concentrated in tech stocks are more vulnerable to market volatility — and, potentially, overvalued assets. For retirees and near-retirees, this poses a conundrum.
With the rising cost of living — including rising healthcare costs — retirees and near-retirees want their investments to beat inflation. Yet, there are growing fears of an AI bubble — and now, with Burry's analysis, there's a new concern to add to the mix.
Most financial professionals recommend a diversified approach to manage risk and reduce volatility. That means spreading investments across different asset classes, sectors and geographies for more consistent long-term returns.
Investors need growth and risk protection. And that's shifting the investor mindset, Mike Loukas, CEO of TrueMark Investments, told CNBC's ETF Edge. Nowadays, many retirees are looking for "performance that's good enough" rather than trying to beat the S&P 500.
For anyone worried about whether current tech valuations reflect actual costs, it's worth sitting down with your financial advisor to make sure your investments match your risk profile and long-term goals.
This week’s fun finds
‘Montreal wings’: Pub bans all things Buffalo in support of Canadiens
Faced with a choice between the sweet taste of victory and the spicy taste of a sauced chicken wing, Cunningham’s Pub in Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue has chosen to excise the word “Buffalo” from its menu ahead of the Montreal Canadiens’ second-round matchup with the Sabres.
In a move some Sabres fans may recognize from their country’s “freedom fries” era, the pub says it will now be serving “Montreal wings.”
And yes, before you say anything, Buffalo Sabres fans did sing the Canadian anthem last week after a singer’s microphone malfunction. But those were simpler times, before the Canadiens had made it to the second round of the NHL playoffs.
