Thursday, April 18, 2019

Investor psychology

Get the Edge - Click here to view an archive of investment education, daily musings, book recommendations and more.
_________________

200 years of human progress (Link)
What we see or read every day skews our perception of the world and makes us believe things are getting worse and worse every day. Threatening negative news passes much more easily through our mental filters then the good news. Another problem is good news or positive progress is gradual and won’t make for good headlines.

The truth is things are unquestionably getting better over time. To help understand the transformation in living conditions here is a visualization from Our World in Data. This chart shows how the lives of 100 people would have changed over the last 200 years if they lived through this transformative period of the modern world.
In 1820, 94% (94 of 100 people) of people in the world lived in extreme poverty. Today, that number is close to 10% (10 of 100 people). Another example – In 1820 only 12% (12 of 100 people) could read. Today that number is over 85% (85 of 100 people). 

You have to live it to believe it (Link)
Seeing the world around you may not be good enough to understand how it works. You have to actually experience it to learn how to operate in it. MIT scientists tested two of cats. The two cats grew up seeing the same thing. But one actually experienced real world conditions while the other merely viewed it. Once the two cats were both brought back to normal conditions the cat who only watched leaped towards the steep ledge and fell straight off. It also failed to blink when an object accelerated towards its face. It couldn’t associate visual objects with what their bodies were supposed to do. The cat that experienced the real world was normal and the other was effectively blind. 

One of the most important topics in business and investing is whether all of us are, in some ways, like these blind cats. Sure, we’ve read about the Great Depression. But most of us didn’t live through it. Can we actually learn lessons from it that make us better when investing? 

In theory, people should make investment decisions based on their goals and the characteristics of the investment options available. But that’s not what people do. Research shows that people’s lifetime investment decisions are heavily anchored to the experiences they had with different investments in their own generation. 

For example, Investor Tren Griffin wrote that he gained a lot of muscle memory that resulted from the Internet bubble. "There is no way you can fully convey in words the experience of being in the lead car as an investor in that roller coaster. Looking at the cycle after the fact is nothing like looking ahead and not knowing what will happen next. The experience still impacts the way I think and act today."

This week we celebrated Kris’s fifth and Teddy’s first anniversary!

Tuesday, April 16, 2019

Wednesday reads

Get the Edge - Click here to view an archive of investment education, daily musings, book recommendations and more.
_________________

How one discount supermarket transformed the way Britain shops (Link) (Listen)
In 1990, a strange new German family-owned grocery chain named Aldi entered the UK market. It only stocked 600 basic items, all at very low prices. This would have shocked the average shopper in Britain who was accustomed to thousands of products and brands, vast fridges and aisles piled high with fresh fruit and vegetables. Most people were confident Aldi would fail in the UK, where there was discernible snobbery about discount stores. 

In the 1990s Aldi focused on building slowly and steadily and remained in the Midlands and the north of England, where store rents were cheaper, and the customers less affluent.  Aldi is a private company, with no shareholders other than Karl Albrecht’s family to answer to, so they could afford to take their time. Staying privately owned allowed Aldi to be unburdened by the short-term pressures for profits faced by its publicly traded rivals. 

Up until 2008, Aldi was still considered a niche UK retailer, locked out of the mainstream market. This all changed when the great financial crisis hit in late 2008. Inflation rose above 5%. Companies laid off staff. Household incomes were squeezed and the big grocery chains in the UK actually raised their prices in line with inflation to try to maintain their profit margins. People were forced to try discounters like Aldi. 

For Aldi, the timing was perfect, as it was just reaching critical mass in the UK. It had about 400 stores, and an established network of manufacturers delivering products that were not only low-price, but also of reasonable quality.  This new phase of rapid growth was inevitable, and Aldi’s managers believed the financial crash brought it on sooner than expected.

Today, Aldi is still growing and is now UK’s fifth largest retailer with over 7.5% market share. Aldi also has 12% of the market in Australia and 2% in the US with plans to raise its number of stores in the US from 1,800 to 2,500 by 2022, which would make it the third-biggest chain in the US by store count, after Walmart and Kroger.

Activist investors help push Japan towards shareholder capitalism $(Link)
The story of Ms. Murakami taking on the business establishment in Japan is remarkable. Her father Yoshiaki Murakami, a well-known bureaucrat turned activist investor, taught her the value of money by making her bet on the cost of dinner. Today Ms. Murakami runs C&I Holdings, a family fund that enables her to influence how Japanese executives run their companies. Her approach is uncompromising. “Whether I am female or young, I still hold the same number of shares and I can exercise them.” Activist investors like Ms. Murakami are helping to accelerate change in Japan’s corporate culture.

Business in Japan has long been an old boys club defended by yes-men with up to half of listed firms shares in the hands of friendly shareholders (mostly banks and insurance firms who tend to support managers). Change in Japan’s corporate culture will not happen overnight but Japan’s current prime minister, Shinzo Abe has enacted new laws as part of his economic-growth strategy to challenge hoary boardroom practices, with the aim of promoting American-style shareholder capitalism. This transformation in Japan is occurring just as US politicians such as Elizabeth Warren argue for a model that looks decidedly Japanese.

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Monday charts

Get the Edge - Click here to view an archive of investment education, daily musings, book recommendations and more.
_________________

Does 2019 look similar to 1999? 
A recent report by Empirical reviews Q1 2019 and highlights supporting data that suggests we could be entering the “New” New Economy Era. Factor returns for Q1 2019 look eerily similar to those in the 18 month run up to the peak in March of 2000 – with the following characteristics outperforming meaningfully:
1) Highest revenue growth
2) Most expensive based on forward P/E
3) Most expensive based on FCF Yield
4) Highest share dilution
5) Highest arbitrage risk
An increasing percentage of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable.
Which categories of active managers have beaten benchmarks? (Link)
A recent study published by Fidelity shows active management beats passive in 12 of 18 investment categories (one category tied).

Friday, April 12, 2019

Weekend catch-up

Your weekend edge - catch up with this week's readings:

Get the Edge - Click here to view an archive of investment education, daily musings, book recommendations and more.
_________________

Fees vs. Fines (Link)
Is market volatility a fee or a fine? Fees are something you pay for admission to get something worthwhile in return. Fines are punishment for doing something wrong. It sounds trivial, but thinking of volatility or drawdowns as fees instead of fines is an important part of developing the kind of mindset that lets you stick around long enough for compounding to work.

A reason market declines hurt and scare so many investors off is because they think of them as fines. The natural response for anyone who watches their wealth decline is to avoid future fines or market declines.

But if you view volatility as a fee, things look different. Returns are never free. They demand you pay a price, like any other product. And since market returns can be not just great but sensational over time, the fee is high. Declines, crashes, panics, manias, recessions, depressions.

The trick is convincing yourself that the fee is worth it. That, is the only way to deal with volatility; not just putting up with it, but realizing that it’s an admission fee worth paying.

Easy money
Since 2009 there have been numerous headlines telling us that the easy money had been made. Avoiding this market noise and staying invested through the drawdowns was hard. Only in hindsight does it look easy.
Jamie Dimon's 2018 letter to shareholders (Link)
Jamie Dimon released his annual letter to shareholders sharing his insights on some critical issues currently churning in the United States. Jamie speaks up for capitalism, stock buybacks and big business.

"There is no question that capitalism has been the most successful economic system the world has ever seen. It has helped lift billions of people out of poverty, and it has helped enhance the wealth, health and education of people around the world. Capitalism enables competition, innovation and choice."

"We much prefer to use our capital to grow than to buy back stock. We believe buying back stock should be considered only when either we cannot invest (sometimes as a result of regulatory policies) or we are generating excess capital that we do not expect to use in the next few years. Buybacks should not be done at the expense of investing appropriately in our company."

The rise in internal collaboration at Berkshire $(Link) 
Executives at Berkshire subsidiary companies now gather regularly to share strategies and best practices.

“Even though we’re in different industries and have different business models, there’s so much that connects us,” said Mary Rhinehart, CEO of Berkshire’s building-products maker Johns Manville. “Why wouldn’t we take advantage of the talent across the Berkshire Hathaway organization?”

Buffet explains how collaboration among Berkshire companies is largely voluntary. “The best cooperation is voluntary. That’s not a change in the culture, though. It’s sort of a sign of the culture. It really is people thinking like owners and exercising, in a sense, their independence.”

Apprenticeships vs. Business School (Link)
Enrollment in two-year, full-time MBA programs in the U.S. fell by more than one-third from 2010 to 2016 and in 2018, applications to business schools in the U.S dropped 7% from the previous year.

The rapid rate of technological change, a booming job market, and the digitization of education are chipping away at the traditional graduate-level business program. To meet today’s business needs, startups and massive companies alike are increasingly hiring technologists, developers, and engineers in place of the MBA graduates they may have preferentially hired in the past.

With disruption to the advanced business education system already here, some business schools are applying notes from their own innovation classes to brace for change. We’ve seen schools with smaller MBA programs shut their doors in favor of advanced degrees with more specialization. Over the past decade, enrollment in specialized graduate business programs doubled.

Apprenticeship models are reemerging as an effective way to train tomorrow's leaders.

How the world’s biggest brewer killed the craft beer buzz (Link)
Craft beer was born in the mid-1960s, when an heir to the Maytag appliance fortune bought a San Francisco brewery called Anchor and began marketing a full-flavored, malty beer as its flagship. Today, there are 7,000 small, independent breweries in the the U.S, the most since pre-Prohibition days. You might think, based on this, that the people have spoken; that Small Beer has won.

You would be wrong. For the past decade, Big Beer has been systematically buying up the craft breweries they couldn’t beat, and Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI) has led the way.

ABI’s acquired craft brands tend be pretty good at making “liquid” that drinkers want, but ABI is really good at the rest. ABI’s “go-to market” machine is a marvel that gives it remarkable influence over how and where its brands are sold  and whether other brewers’ stuff is sold at all. ABI can box out rivals from retail shelves, tap towers, even entire stadium concessions.

How Lino Saputo Jr. built a global dairy empire and stood up to Big Milk (Link)
Saputo Inc. has little name recognition outside of Quebec (the company spends very little on marketing), but it has quietly grown into one of Canada’s top international success stories. With 62 plants on 5 continents and expected sales of more than $13 billion this year, 70% of which come from outside Canada, it is among the largest dairy processors in the world. 

When Saputo's CEO thrust himself into the NAFTA trade fight last summer, breaking ranks with Canada’s powerful dairy lobby to side with American farmers, it was revealing: Saputo Inc. may be a creature of Canada’s dairy cartel, having benefited early on from the protectionism it entails, but its CEO is an insider more than willing to stand on the outside. Canadian dairy farmers, he told reporters last June, “want their cake, and they want to eat it too. You can’t hold onto your milk-supply-managed system and have a class of milk competing with world markets at the same time.”

For close to 50 years, Canada's supply-managed dairy industry, which shields farmers from international competition through a mix of quotas, tariffs and price controls, has defied every effort at reform. The election of Donald Trump changed everything. Trump quickly drew a large bullseye on Canadian dairy, repeatedly flaying the country for “what they've done to our dairy farm workers".

Saputo has no regrets about breaking with the dairy lobby on the issue, calling their arguments “propaganda”. For a company like Saputo that wants to continue to grow they have to think about markets outside of Canada.

Thursday, April 11, 2019

Friday reads

Get the Edge - Click here to view an archive of investment education, daily musings, book recommendations and more.
_________________

Apprenticeships vs. Business School  (Link)
Enrollment in two-year, full-time MBA programs in the U.S. fell by more than one-third from 2010 to 2016 and in 2018, applications to business schools in the U.S dropped 7% from the previous year.

The rapid rate of technological change, a booming job market, and the digitization of education are chipping away at the traditional graduate-level business program. To meet today’s business needs, startups and massive companies alike are increasingly hiring technologists, developers, and engineers in place of the MBA graduates they may have preferentially hired in the past.

With disruption to the advanced business education system already here, some business schools are applying notes from their own innovation classes to brace for change. We’ve seen schools with smaller MBA programs shut their doors in favor of advanced degrees with more specialization. Over the past decade, enrollment in specialized graduate business programs doubled.


Apprenticeship models are reemerging as an effective way to train tomorrow's leaders.

How world’s biggest brewer killed the craft beer buzz (Link)
Craft beer was born in the mid-1960s, when an heir to the Maytag appliance fortune bought a San Francisco brewery called Anchor and began marketing a full-flavored, malty beer as its flagship. Today, there are 7,000 small, independent breweries in the the U.S, the most since pre-Prohibition days. You might think, based on this, that the people have spoken; that Small Beer has won.

You would be wrong. For the past decade, Big Beer has been systematically buying up the craft breweries they couldn’t beat, and Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI) has led the way.

ABI’s acquired craft brands tend be pretty good at making “liquid” that drinkers want, but ABI is really good at the rest. ABI’s “go-to market” machine is a marvel that gives it remarkable influence over how and where its brands are sold  and whether other brewers’ stuff is sold at all. ABI can box out rivals from retail shelves, tap towers, even entire stadium concessions.

How Lino Saputo Jr. built a global dairy empire and stood up to Big Milk (Link)
Saputo Inc. has little name recognition outside of Quebec (the company spends very little on marketing), but it has quietly grown into one of Canada’s top international success stories. With 62 plants on 5 continents and expected sales of more than $13 billion this year, 70% of which come from outside Canada, it is among the largest dairy processors in the world. 

When Saputo's CEO thrust himself into the NAFTA trade fight last summer, breaking ranks with Canada’s powerful dairy lobby to side with American farmers, it was revealing: Saputo Inc. may be a creature of Canada’s dairy cartel, having benefited early on from the protectionism it entails, but its CEO is an insider more than willing to stand on the outside. Canadian dairy farmers, he told reporters last June, “want their cake, and they want to eat it too. You can’t hold onto your milk-supply-managed system and have a class of milk competing with world markets at the same time.”

For close to 50 years, Canada's supply-managed dairy industry, which shields farmers from international competition through a mix of quotas, tariffs and price controls, has defied every effort at reform. The election of Donald Trump changed everything. Trump quickly drew a large bullseye on Canadian dairy, repeatedly flaying the country for “what they've done to our dairy farm workers".

Saputo has no regrets about breaking with the dairy lobby on the issue, calling their arguments “propaganda”. For a company like Saputo that wants to continue to grow they have to think about markets outside of Canada. 















Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Staying invested

Get the Edge - Click here to view an archive of investment education, daily musings, book recommendations and more.
_________________

Fees vs. Fines (Link)
Is market volatility a fee or a fine? Fees are something you pay for admission to get something worthwhile in return. Fines are punishment for doing something wrong. It sounds trivial, but thinking of volatility or drawdowns as fees instead of fines is an important part of developing the kind of mindset that lets you stick around long enough for compounding to work.

A reason market declines hurt and scare so many investors off is because they think of them as fines. The natural response for anyone who watches their wealth decline is to avoid future fines or market declines.

But if you view volatility as a fee, things look different. Returns are never free. They demand you pay a price, like any other product. And since market returns can be not just great but sensational over time, the fee is high. Declines, crashes, panics, manias, recessions, depressions.

The trick is convincing yourself that the fee is worth it. That, is the only way to deal with volatility; not just putting up with it, but realizing that it’s an admission fee worth paying.

Easy money
Since 2009 there have been numerous headlines telling us that the easy money had been made. Avoiding this market noise and staying invested through the drawdowns was hard. Only in hindsight does it look easy.

Sunday, April 7, 2019

CEO insights

Get the Edge - Click here to view an archive of investment education, daily musings, book recommendations and more.
_________________

Jamie Dimon's 2018 letter to shareholders (Link)
Jamie Dimon released his annual letter to shareholders sharing his insights on some critical issues currently churning in the United States. Jamie speaks up for capitalism, stock buybacks and big business.

"There is no question that capitalism has been the most successful economic system the world has ever seen. It has helped lift billions of people out of poverty, and it has helped enhance the wealth, health and education of people around the world. Capitalism enables competition, innovation and choice."

"We much prefer to use our capital to grow than to buy back stock. We believe buying back stock should be considered only when either we cannot invest (sometimes as a result of regulatory policies) or we are generating excess capital that we do not expect to use in the next few years. Buybacks should not be done at the expense of investing appropriately in our company."

The rise in internal collaboration at Berkshire $(Link) 
Executives at Berkshire subsidiary companies now gather regularly to share strategies and best practices.

“Even though we’re in different industries and have different business models, there’s so much that connects us,” said Mary Rhinehart, CEO of Berkshire’s building-products maker Johns Manville. “Why wouldn’t we take advantage of the talent across the Berkshire Hathaway organization?”

Buffet explains how collaboration among Berkshire companies is largely voluntary. “The best cooperation is voluntary. That’s not a change in the culture, though. It’s sort of a sign of the culture. It really is people thinking like owners and exercising, in a sense, their independence.”