This week's interesting finds

September 28, 2019

EdgePoint Partners' back to school reading list
Over the past few weeks, we have been collecting some of the reads that have caught your attention lately. The results are in! Here are some of the books that come highly recommended by EdgePoint partners: 

• Simple Wealth, Inevitable Wealth by Nick Murray. It’s a book for advisors to give to clients, in order to establish two great, complementary investing truths: (1) that equities are essential to long-term wealth-building and to a solidly rising income in retirement; and (2) that no one will ever be able to hold equities through all the fears (and fads) of the market cycle without you – the empathetic but tough-loving Behavioral Investment Counselor.
• The Code: Silicon Valley and the Remaking of America by Margaret O’Mara. The true, behind-the-scenes history of the people who built Silicon Valley and shaped Big Tech in America.
• The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We do in Life and Business, by Charles Duhigg. It explores the science behind habit creation and reformation. The key to exercising regularly, losing weight, being more productive, and achieving success is understanding how habits work.
• Sell or Be Sold: How to Get Your Way in Business and in Life, by Grant Cardone. Whether it's selling your company's product in the boardroom or selling yourself on eating healthy, everything in life can and should be treated as a sale. Cardone breaks down the techniques and approaches necessary to master the art of selling in any avenue. You will learn how to handle rejection, turn around negative situations, shorten sales cycles, and guarantee yourself greatness.
• The Talent Revolution: Longevity and the Future of Work, By Lisa Taylor and Fern Lebo. The definitive guide to maximizing workforce value, The Talent Revolution exposes work-life longevity as the most influential driver transforming today’s workplace – a competitive edge for organizations smart enough to capitalize on it.
• Talking to Strangers: What We Should Know About the People We Don't Know, by Malcolm Gladwell. The book offers a powerful examination of our interactions with strangers--and why they often go wrong.
• A Higher Call, by Adam Makos. This is the true story of the two pilots whose lives collided in the skies one day. An incredible story of a brotherhood between enemies, that emerged from the horrors of World War II.
• The Fifth Risk: Undoing Democracy, by Michael Lewis. A 2018 political book by Michael Lewis. It examines the transition and political appointments of the Donald Trump presidency, especially with respect to three government agencies: the Department of Energy, the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Commerce.
• When Breath Becomes Air, by Paul Kalanithi. A profoundly moving memoir by a young neurosurgeon faced with a terminal cancer diagnosis who attempts to answer the question “What makes a life worth living?”

S&P 500 Return: Earnings Growth vs. Multiple Expansion

The amount of IPO capital raised by unprofitable firms keeps climbing

During the dot-com bubble, investors flocked to bet on the purported next big thing. A similar theme can be spotted in today’s IPO market, with some companies asking buyers to bet on unproven technology and untested revenue models. Many winners have emerged, but this deluge of disruptors has also laid down a minefield.

Historical market returns vs. ISM manufacturing index

The left chart shows the correlation between ISM manufacturing index and 10-year Treasury yields since 2010.  A PMI index above 50% indicates that the manufacturing economy is expanding, and a PMI index below 50% indicates that the manufacturing economy is declining.  The right chart shows the correlation between S&P 500 returns and ISM readings over or under 50.

Mixed signals from bond yields 

According to government bond yields, we are making a bee-line for Armageddon. According to credit spreads, clear skies on the horizon.

Stock market returns are inconsistent.

Maybe the best and worst part about the markets is the fact that two investors can look at the same exact data and come to completely different conclusions. Looking at the two stats below many might say that “buy & hold doesn’t work” or “this is why I time the market”.

$10k invested in the S&P 500 in Jan 2000 would be worth $29,181 by the end of Aug 2019

$10k invested in the S&P 500 in Jan 2010 would be worth $32,100 by the end of Aug 2019

The first situation invested at the height of the dot-com bubble which might have been the worst entry point in U.S. stock market history. The dot-com bubble soon burst leading the S&P 500  to fall by 45%; 10 years later the financial crisis hit and the S&P 500 fell again, but this time by 51%. Despite this, the investors still managed to triple their money and earn 5.9% annually as of August 2019. How many investors would sign up for 5.9% annual returns today for the next 20 years?

Stock market returns are inconsistent. Sometimes returns are front-loaded, sometimes they’re back-loaded and sometimes they’re not great, even over longer time frames. One period of inconsistent or poor returns isn’t a reason to give up on the stock market. That’s how it works.

This week's interesting finds

September 21, 2019

Earlier in the summer, we presented our Investment team’s top literary picks for the season. We hope you enjoyed them! Now, in the spirit of sharing interests, we’d love to hear which books and podcasts have caught your attention lately. Share your recommendations HERE and we may feature them in an upcoming edition of Inside Edge! 

Video: An investor's journey with EdgePoint

We’re proud of how we’ve been able to help our partners and end clients by building their wealth during the first 10 years of our existence. To help build for EdgePoint’s second decade, we’ve made a video to remind people that the first one wasn’t always a smooth ride but that it paid to be patient during the tough times. Volatility is a constant in the market, how our clients react to it however will determine if they can get to their Point B. 

More on negative-yielding bonds

According to Jeff Gundlach: “79% of all negative-yielding bonds are held by central banks.”

With $14 trillion in negative-yielding debt globally, that means that $3 trillion was bought by actual investors.

Saudi oil reserves

Members of the International Energy Agency are required to hold emergency stocks of oil that could cover 90 days’ worth of lost imports. They can deploy these reserves in unison to avoid an oil shock, as in June 2011, when the U.S. and 27 other countries acted to release 60 million barrels of oil from strategic reserves to drive down prices during the disruption caused by the civil war in Libya. The U.S. holds around 600 million barrels of oil in reserve and other governments have a further 1.2 billion.

Saudi Arabia’s own oil reserves have fallen in recent years, but remain sufficient to ensure the kingdom’s customers don’t experience shortages. The only stipulation is that the disruption must be short-lived. The nation holds enough to cover the country’s exports for around 35 days.

A look at what countries are dependent on Saudi oil.

The chart on the left shows total crude exports from Saudi Arabia by destination country with Japan, China, US, South Korea & India making up the bulk of their exports. The chart on the right shows Saudi Arabia’s share of each nation’s crude petroleum imports with Japan and South Korea being the most dependent.

How Buffett's Brain Works

Here are some key factors Warren Buffett considers when looking at potential opportunities:

Simplicity - Is the business easy to understand?
Operating History  - Has the business been around for a long time, with a consistent operating history?
Long-Term Prospects - Is there reason to believe that the business will be able to sustain success in the long-term?
Rational Decisions - Is management wise when it comes to reinvesting earnings or returning profits to shareholders as dividends?
Candidness - Does the management team admit mistakes? Are they honest with shareholders?
Margin of Safety - What’s the chance you’ll lose money on the stock, in the long run, if you buy it at today’s price?

This week's interesting finds

September 14, 2019

Earlier in the summer, we presented our Investment team’s top literary picks for the season. We hope you enjoyed them! Now, in the spirit of sharing interests, we’d love to hear which books and podcasts have caught your attention lately. Share your recommendations HERE and we may feature them in an upcoming edition of Inside Edge! 

The worst day for momentum since 2009

Earlier this week many growth stocks (generally companies that are seeing rapid profit increases) took a dramatic turn downward as measured by Bloomberg’s Pure Growth Portfolio. In essence, many of 2019’s hottest stocks took a large hit, while the year’s most unloved stocks have enjoyed a rally.

This sudden reversal is what drove US momentum to have its worst single-day decline since 2009.

Can you stomach the next big market swing?

The quiz that your financial adviser may have given you isn’t really a good way of understanding your tolerance for risk.

If I ask you in a questionnaire whether you are afraid of snakes, you might say no. If I throw a live snake in your lap and then ask if you’re afraid of snakes, you’ll probably say yes—if you ever talk to me again.

Investing is like that: on a bland, hypothetical quiz, it’s easy to say you’d buy more stocks if the market fell 10%, 20% or more. In a real market crash, it’s a lot harder to step up and buy when every stock price is turning blood-red and your family is begging you not to throw more money into the flames.

This is why financial advisors use risk tolerance questionnaires to help determine how much risk their clients should be exposed to. Unfortunately, imagining your future behavior or accessing that behavior from a risk questionnaire isn’t as easy. New research shows financial advisers create drastically different portfolios even when clients appear to have the same tolerance for taking the risk.

Professionals in many fields are vulnerable to what the Nobel prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman calls “noise,” or variation in judgment driven by such irrelevant factors as emotion, time of day or the weather.

To do better, think about how your past experiences might shape your future expectations. Did you buy your first stock at the beginning of a bull market? That could skew you toward taking more risk. Did you start a business during a recession? That could make you more gung-ho if it thrived or gun-shy if it failed.

One researcher suggests that the best guide to whether you will dump stocks in the next financial crisis is whether you did in the last one.

Your perceptions of risk are only part of the puzzle. At least as important is your risk capacity. Think of your spending habits, your non-financial assets and how easily you could sell them in a pinch. Also vital are your goals. You can’t know how much risk to take until you estimate when and how much you’ll need to spend in the future.

Ultimately any good adviser should devote more time to your risk capacity and your goals than to your risk tolerance.

A behavioral prescription

There have been 17 separate 5% pullbacks since stocks bottomed in 2009. Each one of them felt like the top. The chart below shows some of the headlines and quotes you might have read during these market declines. 

It’s hard to see headlines like this and not act on them. We know now that our worst fears did not come to pass, but there was no way to know at the time that each and every one of these pullbacks would resolve themselves to the upside.

One of the worst things that investors can do is overreact to market volatility. It’s perfectly normal to feel something, but adopting an all in or all out mentality when the market goes up and down is destined to fail.

How the invention of spreadsheet software unleashed Wall Street on the world

At one point or another many of us have had to use spreadsheets for school, work, or personal use. This article points to some interesting correlations between Wall Street and the rise of the spreadsheet.

In 2010, a pair of researchers published a controversial economics paper. It was cited by UK politicians to justify austerity measures that sparked economic and employment crises, and anti-austerity protests—measures that the UN later called “punitive, mean-spirited, and often callous” inflicting “great misery.” In 2013, however, this widely influential paper was found to have been substantially off in its estimates, thanks in part to a simple spreadsheet error: specifically, “a few rows left out of an equation to average the values in a column,” the Guardian wrote at the time.

This famous foul-up is just one of many instances when digital predictions have let us down, creating a sharp contrast between the reality of things and what the numbers foretold.

Rock-bottom bond yields spread from Japan to the rest of the world

When the Bank of Japan’s board meets on September 19th, it is not expected to reduce its main interest rate, currently at -0.1%. But any increase in interest rates seems a long way off. And as long as rates are at rock-bottom in Japan, it is hard for them to be raised in other places. Bond-buying by desperate Japanese banks and insurance companies is a big part of what keeps a lid on yields elsewhere.

Japan is already the world’s biggest creditor with its net foreign assets (Japans assets minus what they owe to foreigners) at around $3 trillion, or 60% of its annual GDP. This chart shows how since 2012 both sides of its national balance-sheet have grown rapidly as Japanese investors borrowed abroad to buy more and more assets.

Globally, Japan’s impact is felt most keenly in corporate-credit markets in America and Europe. Japan’s pension and insurance firms are in a pinch to make regular payments to retirees so they look abroad for yield. Some see Japan as a template: its path of ever-lower interest rates is one that other rich, debt-ridden economies have been destined to follow and will now struggle to escape.

This week's interesting finds

September 6, 2019

EDGE-ucation camp
Since 2013, EdgePoint has been organizing EDGE-ucation camps for the children of our partners. These one-day events are aimed at kids ages 13 to 18 and cover the foundations and importance of investing and building long-term wealth. 

The camp has grown every year. As more kids attend these events, we’ve been adding more camps in more cities. 

Over the last 2 years, EdgePoint partners have visited 13 cities across Canada to share their knowledge and experience about things that can hurt savings and what people can do to reach their financial goals. Our hope is that with this program we can teach future generations about investing and other concepts that will help foster good future decision-making, financial independence, and self-confidence.

We sent out a survey to see how these lessons have impacted the attendees of the camp. Here are the results.

We were excited to see two campers select “Other” because it means they took the lessons to heart and looked for new ways to apply them. The answers were:

• Opened a savings builder account with a higher interest rate
• Want to buy a stock

Is Your Stock Portfolio A Museum or A Warehouse?

You don’t make a great museum by putting all the art in the world into a single room. That’s a warehouse. What makes a museum great is the stuff that’s not on the walls. Many items don’t make it to the walls so there is an editing process. There’s a lot more stuff off the walls than on the walls. The stuff on the walls is the best sub-subset of all the possibilities.

When you apply this crucial lesson to building your stock portfolio, it means that you are likely to succeed as an investor not just by the stocks you own, but also by the ones you don’t.

People buy stocks for all kind of reasons – they like them, their neighbours like them, their friends are making money on them, someone on Twitter is shouting about them, their prices have risen sharply in past few months, someone recommended them on TV, someone wrote about them on online forums, someone is boasting about them on WhatsApp groups, etc.

Often, we end up building warehouses of our portfolios, not curated museums. Some people even maintain multiple portfolios, and each looks like a zoo of mismanaged, rowdy animals. You will do yourself a world of good by saying no to most things and not adding a lot of unwanted stocks to your portfolios. In other words, be a curator of stocks, not a warehouse manager.

Skin in the game matters, especially for riskier, leveraged investment approaches

In Norway, tax returns are publicly available making it possible to collect data on asset managers’ taxable wealth.

Three researchers conducted a study on 120 private equity professionals in Norway. The main objective was to test whether or not co-investment had a meaningful impact on manager choices. The researchers found that managers with more skin in the game tend to select investments with less risky cashflows and took on more debt to finance purchases as their purchases were generally of lower risk. The research suggests that outside investors in private equity funds could incentivize their managers to take less risk by requiring them to invest their own capital.

Over $1 trillion in negative yielding corporates outstanding

























Maybe everyone is buying negative yielding bonds because some of them are up 35% YTD...

This week's interesting finds

August 30, 2019

Wisdom from the Oracle

Warren Buffett is famous for his wit, and will likely go down in history as one of the most quotable and influential investors of all time. This week marks his 89th birthday. This infographic highlights some of the smartest and most insightful quotes from Buffett on investing, business, and life, accumulated through his lengthy and prestigious career.

“Never invest in a business you cannot understand.”

"The most important quality for an investor is temperament, not intellect. You need a temperament that neither derives great pleasure from being with the crowd or against the crowd." 

“It’s only when the tide goes out that you learn who has been swimming naked.”

"Price is what you pay; value is what you get."

"Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful."

“It takes 20 years to build a reputation and five minutes to ruin it. If you think about that, you'll do things differently." 

“Failing conventionally is the route to go; as a group, lemmings may have a rotten image, but no individual lemming has ever received bad press.”

“The most important investment you can make is in yourself.”

John Neff – Shunning fads and looking where others didn’t 

John Neff started managing Wellington Management’s Windsor mutual fund in 1964. Over the three decades, he was among the most successful fund managers of his era.

Mr. Neff, who died June 4 at age 87, shunned fads, such as the “go-go” stocks of the 1960s or the “nifty fifty” of the 1970s. Instead, he looked for stocks that were “overlooked, misunderstood, forgotten, out of favor,” as he put it. He favored steady performers and aimed to pay a low multiple of annual earnings.

Among his pithier tips: “When you feel like bragging about a stock, it’s probably time to sell.”

Young people’s love of cities isn't wearing off 

Some demographic experts predicted that young adults’ fascination with urban living would fade as they settled down, got married, and had children, at which point they, too, would follow their parents and grandparents to the suburbs.

A new study finds that not only have young people been a driving force in the urban resurgence of the past two decades, but they favor living in central urban neighborhoods significantly more than previous generations did at the same stages in life.

The locational preferences of young adults hold large consequences. Millennials make up America’s largest generation, bigger even than the Baby Boomers. Where they choose to live will have a lasting impact on which places grow, which stagnate, and which decline. This can be seen in the skyrocketing housing prices and affordability crises of a growing number of American cities.

Some retail investors may need a reality check

A survey of 9,100 retail investors in 25 countries finds that many are in need of a reality check. It shows that retail investors feel confident in their return expectations, with long-term return expectations in Canada at 10.1%, while financial professionals surveyed believe a return of 5.7% is more realistic for clients.

Our 10-year Partner Program

To show our appreciation for our partners who have had the conviction and unwavering long-term view by staying invested with us for 10 or more years, the 10-year Partner Program offers lower management fees. 

We believe that one of the keys to pleasing investment returns is taking a long-term view and holding good, undervalued businesses until the market fully recognizes their potential. While you can be lucky over short periods of time, it takes considerable skill to achieve long-term outperformance. The same notion applies to our investors. To succeed in getting to your Point B (whatever your financial goals may be), it takes conviction, a good financial advisor, the fortitude to embrace volatility and, above all, an unwavering long-term view.

This week's interesting finds

August 23, 2019

An important read: Why profits matter (and value investing is not dead)

We have currently reached the point in this cycle where many investors/commentators have started to question whether profits no longer matter, and also whether value investing is dead. As is often the case, the arguments put forward in the affirmative derive mostly from recent market experience/outcomes, rather than reasoning from first principles. Hyper-growth (and generally loss-making) tech companies have seen outsized share price gains, with many recent IPO vintages also seeing triple-digit gains, despite the absence of any profits either in the past or foreseeable future, in echos of the dot.com bubble. Meanwhile, many profitable and cash-generative companies with low growth, and especially with falling earnings/revenues, have been absolutely massacred.

Profits are vitally important, not only because that is the only means by which stocks ultimately generate returns for, but also because profits (and losses) are absolutely vital to the healthy functioning of a capitalist economy, and indeed are the ultimate test of whether a company is doing anything worthwhile at all.

Over the past decade, the need for profitability has broken down in many areas of the economy, as loss-making companies have not only been allowed to survive but are also rapidly growing. In many cases, they have only grown because an extraordinary amount of capital has flown into venture capital and other tech-based funds.

Many investors today are currently impressed with rapid rates of revenue growth, regardless of the state of the bottom line. Much as with the dot.com bubble and its subsequent unraveling, where many 'old world' value businesses were left for dead, only to stage dramatic recoveries in the following decade, a likely consequence of the coming tech wreck will be a significant resurgence in the performance of many 'value' stocks, as their sales, market share, and profitability recover as 'disruptive' competitors go broke, and their multiples dramatically recover.

When will the reckoning occur? It is impossible to say, but it will occur when the funding bubble bursts and companies are forced to once again fund themselves from operating cash flow.

Could it be when the pace of cumulative losses across the upstart tech ecosystem starts to exceed the pace of new fundraisings? Softbank has been a major contributor to startup fundraising with its outrageously-sized US$100bn Vision Fund. Softbank has already blown through the majority of this funding in only two years. But the pace of operating losses continues to mushroom, and Softbank is now running out of money. As a result, Softbank is currently trying to hastily prepare a second US$100bn Vision Fund to keep the house of cards intact. Time will tell whether they succeed.

On the Other Hand - implications of the Fed’s interest-rate management

Is it the Fed’s job to sustain expansions and keep market dislocations at bay ad infinitum?
Many people take Fed actions at face value.  When the Fed cuts interest rates investors take that as a “buy” signal.  Their thought process is simple: weak economy → rate cuts → economic stimulus → stronger GDP → higher corporate profits → higher stock prices.  
Are low-Interest Rates a Good Thing?

The Fed’s decision early this year to depart from its announced program of rate increases to the S&P 500’s gain of roughly 20% so far this year. But how, exactly, do low rates contribute to wealth creation?

Low rates reduce the discount factor used in calculating the net present value of future cash flows.

By reducing the interest expense on companies’ floating-rate debt, low rates enhance companies’ profits; make it easier for them to service their debt; and leave them more cash for capital expenditures, and dividends and stock buy-backs.

What about the downside? 
Low rates stimulate the economy, and most economists and businesspeople believe there’s such a thing as the economy becoming too hot.  The principal worry is excessive inflation.  While some inflation is a good thing, too much isn’t.  

When low rates penalize savers by reducing the returns available on instruments like cash, money market funds, savings accounts.

Should we be happy to see the Fed trying to prolong the economic expansion and the bull market when they’re already the longest in history?  Should it try to produce perpetual prosperity and permanently ward off a correction?  Are there risks in its trying to do so?  It all depends on which hand is doing the weighing.

Three Mindsets of Great Investing Teams

Culture reflects the mindset of a firm. The mindset is the set of attitudes that the firm holds. So what sorts of mindsets correlate with investment success and better decisions?

Understanding 
Great investment teams are more interested in getting the facts on the table and searching for the truth than they are in winning the argument or looking good. The best among them learn to recognize when they have become defensive so they can shift back to that curious mindset.

Candor
The ego wants to win, but the good team member wants to encourage open and honest communication. Success means that we have encouraged others to remain curious. Failure is when the discussion turns defensive and unproductive.

Appreciation
All criticism and no appreciation creates a fearful environment. When we’re in such a space, we wonder if any of our work is valued, if we’re doing anything right. And we become more risk-averse and myopic: If our normal work generates negative feedback, why take a chance and stretch beyond our already constricted comfort zones?


Less size and more insight

The age of asset gatherers has peaked and the asset management industry is re-entering the age of the boutique, where it began. What will matter is less size and more insight, which will support the outcomes sought by asset owners. Delivering that added value will require closer economic alignment between asset managers and asset owners.

This week's interesting finds

August 17, 2019

U.S. mortgage debt hits a new record
U.S. mortgage debt reached a new record in the second quarter, exceeding its 2008 peak. The steep drop in mortgage rates boosted borrowers’ incentive to take out a mortgage or refinance. Alongside higher home prices, a factor behind rising mortgage debt balances is homeowners tapping into home equity for cash when they refinance. Still, the household debt picture is different in 2019. Despite the higher debt levels, Americans appear to be keeping up with their payments.

EdgePoint bond desk: Four more rate cuts might be excessive
Core prices rose 2.2% versus a year earlier in July, the largest increase since December. Even this increase counts as tame and suggests that the Fed's preferred measure of core prices may remain below the 2% inflation target. Still, after the two largest back-to-back monthly increases in core prices since 2006, when the Fed was on the inflation-fighting warpath, it is harder to get worked up about “too low” inflation. Especially with the unemployment rate at 3.7%. 

It's never been cheaper to borrow in Denmark
Banks in Denmark are now effectively paying qualified homebuyers who take out a 10-year fixed-rate mortgage. Jyske Bank, the third-largest bank in Denmark, will now lend to prospective homebuyers at an interest rate of -0.5%.

Risk in investing
Risk is the four-letter word of investing, but it is poorly understood. Consider, for example, the two different investments in the accompanying table: Investment A and Investment B.

Which investment would you prefer? A or B?

Everyone would prefer investment A. After all, you end up with more money after three years. But, which investment is riskier? According to investment orthodoxy, Investment A is riskier! Why? Because it has a higher standard deviation (or volatility of returns) at 23.6% than Investment B at 0%. Doesn’t that strike you as odd? In investing, if you don’t want volatility, then you have to accept that you won’t have much upside potential.

Sandro's movie recommendations 

We asked Sandro, the most passionate movie buff at EdgePoint, for his top 10 movie picks of all time. After agonizing for days over this list, this was his response:

Films have had a profound influence on shaping the man I am. In fact, great films have the power not only to entertain but more importantly to transform the way we see the world. Truly great films, like a great vintage wine, get better with age. Each subsequent viewing reveals new pleasures and they become more socially and culturally relevant.

Ok. That’s enough with my ramblings. Keep in mind that if you asked me next week, it might be a completely different list. I didn’t even include a foreign film. I love foreign films!

Sandro’s Top 10 of All Time… more specifically on August 13, 2019

Citizen Kane (1941) - Welles
Casablanca (1942)  - Curtiz
Vertigo (1958) – Hitchcock
The Good, the Bad & the Ugly (1966) - Leone 
The Godfather (1972) – Coppola
Annie Hall (1977) - Allen
Goodfellas (1990) – Scorsese
Pulp Fiction (1994) – Tarantino
Boogie Nights (1997) – Anderson
The Social Network (2010) - Fincher